![]()
Tool Category G: Communications
and Education
25. Media Professionalization
(Journalist Training;
Joint Journalist Projects)
Description |
Professionalization makes the media more independent and improves standards in collecting, editing, reporting and disseminating objective and balanced information. Professionalization measures include journalist training, editorial training, sponsoring joint journalist teams, promoting diversification of media sources, and expanding distribution. |
|
Objectives |
Professionalization should encourage fair and truthful coverage of an issues different sides along with improved standards for reporters and editors in collecting, editing, reporting and disseminating information and in taking measures to make this information more objective and balanced. |
|
Expected outcome or impact |
Professionalizing the media should reduce control by government or partisan private entities over the media; broaden media outlets and access; encourage alternative viewpoints; reduce partisan and biased reporting; improve media standards; and improve how diverse groups are represented to encourage a more balanced depiction of events. |
|
Relationship to conflict prevention and mitigation |
The media are often deliberately used to incite civil unrest; government control or partisan ownership of news, commentary, documentary, and entertainment can aggravate conflict when those controlling the media restrict media freedom, prevent communications between certain groups, or limit information sources to their own groups perspective. A regime can manipulate the media to divide groups which could oppose it or to conceal its own violent activities from the majority of citizens. Media used with appropriate professionalism and attention to preventing conflict can help to reverse these tendencies towards conflict, reaching diverse groups and exposing them to viewpoints which may make them less inclined to use violence against others. Supporting independent media in emerging democracies helps to consolidate and nurture a democratic society: successful media professionalization projects contribution to "promoting democracy, pluralism, conflict resolution, and the growth of active, well-informed civil societies in emerging democracies is undeniable." |
|
Implementation Organizers |
Local or outside groups can initiate efforts to professionalize the media. External actors have included foreign NGOs, foreign media, international professional media associations, and educational institutions. External funding and support is often needed; the USUSAID, USIAand other government agencies, private enterprises and private foundations have sponsored media professionalization projects. | |
Participants |
Current and prospective journalists, editors, and media owners can participate in media professionalization efforts. Implementation staff have included members of foreign media, representatives of international media associations, NGOs, and foreign educational institutions media departments. |
|
Activities |
Professionalizing the media can include measures to:
|
|
Cost considerations |
Training and media exchange programs can be relatively inexpensive. Media equipment can be more costly (several million dollars). |
|
Other resource considerations |
Media professionalization can require equipment, trainers and technical assistants depending on the program and goals. |
|
Set-up time |
Some media professionalization activities can be implemented relatively. |
|
Timeframe to see results |
Many media professionalization measures can show quick results and have a significant, long-lasting effect on conflict prevention and mitigation. |
|
Conflict context Stages of conflict |
Professionalization of the media can be effective at all stages of conflict, including the early stages, during the peak of a conflict, and during the reconciliation stage. However, it may be difficult to institute such programs when conflicts are "hot" because governments may view these efforts with suspicion. |
|
Type of conflict |
This tool is especially useful for ethnic and regional conflicts. |
|
Causes of conflict |
Media professionalization activities can contribute both to operational and structural conflict prevention. In the near term, media professionalization can contribute to operational conflict prevention by presenting a more balanced view, portraying issues fairly from rivals perspectives, cooling down tempers and opening dialogue. Over time, increased professionalization can contribute to greater democracy which can help encourage political conflicts to be played out in the political realm instead of through violence. |
|
Prerequisites |
Effective media professionalization requires the ability to institute professional journalistic standards; willingness on the part of media professionals to undergo training and to apply their training; willingness of media owners to permit such training and adopt professional standards; and professional media specialists who can speak the local language to serve as trainers. |
|
Past practice Outside the Greater Horn |
Internews is an international non-profit organization specializing in global communications, working to enhance tolerance and understanding by supporting independent non-governmental television, radio and print media in emerging democracies. Internews produces and distributes innovative television programming on national and international issues and uses electronic media as a tool to reduce conflict within and between countries.
Media and Conflict Education, Macedonia. In 1994, the Center for War, Peace, and the News Media, a unit of New York Universitys Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, and Search for Common Ground launched a media and conflict education program in Macedonia. The programs purpose was to explore the medias role in inter-ethnic relations and to develop innovative approaches to covering ethnic tensions. They designed and organized a cross-ethnic feature reporting project in July 1995. The four goals of the project were as follows:
The four participating journalists were on leave from their normal media organizations and received a stipend from Search for Common Ground. The project was funded by the National Endowment for Democracy, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Winston Foundation for World Peace, and the Soros Foundations. Project organizers believe this type of collaborative reporting across ethnic lines was new in Macedonia and contrasts with the Macedonian medias traditionally ethnically partisan reporting. Interviewing ordinary people rather than officials and "experts" was a new style of reporting for the participants, and made the reporters more aware of stereotyping, and each experienced personal revelations. Minor ethnic tensions sometimes surfaced around word choices and interview subjects ethnic mix. The editor constantly recommended steering clear of political arguments. She was cautious not to lecture them on how to do "proper journalism," pressing instead for more details, restructuring stories based on information they collected together, and encouraging reporters to re-examine their notes for key points left out. The participants reacted very positively. The team of four participating journalists produced a series they titled "How We Survive" that examined how ordinary citizens of all classes, ethnicities and religions fare under difficult economic conditions in Macedonia. The articles were published simultaneously in three newspapers represented by the print reporters of the team (the leading Macedonian-, Albanian-, and Turkish-language papers in Macedonia) and adapted for radio broadcast. The products were well-received by the public and the editors. A press conference resulted in additional stories in the main newspapers, and radio and TV interviews. The organizers consider the project to have been "successful on every level." The projects direct or indirect contribution to conflict prevention or mitigation has not been evaluated, and would be difficult to determine. No independent evaluation has examined the project and its impact. The two organizers partnered again to organize a similar project working with a new team of reporters, again from four different media organizations in Macedonia, this time on health care issues. As with the previous project, the reporters are conducting interviews in cross-ethnic teams to gain access to individuals from a range of ethnic groups and social classes and to present a balanced view of the issues. Other examples.
|
|
Evaluation Strengths |
Independent media are essential to a free society. Sponsoring cross-ethnic journalist teams teaches the value of cross-ethnic cooperation. Cross-ethnic teams and methods such as professionalization seminars and group exercises can make reporters more aware of ethnic stereotyping and bias, and their effects. |
|
Weaknesses |
Privatized media may concentrate media ownership in the hands of the wealthy few, leading to another bias. Privatized media can run the risk of remaining or falling into the hands of former directors who continue or turn to graft, corruption, and bankruptcy. |
|
Lessons learned |
Foreign efforts to professionalize and encourage independent media must respect ethnic, cultural, national and religious diversity and encourage these values in reporting. It is important for foreign sponsors to help independent media find ways to become commercially self-sustaining instead of maintaining sponsorship. Providing free or low-cost popular foreign programming for a limited time can help newly independent stations attain commercial success during their critical transition period. Joining independent stations into a network or pooling programming and funds can help local stations stay solvent. Little has been written about the medias potential role in preventive diplomacy. One project proposed by the NYU Center intends to analyze the medias role in recent preventive diplomacy efforts, hoping to address how those involved in preventive diplomacy can make better use of national and international media resources, activities available through peace media in support of preventive diplomacy, practical and procedural information and resources necessary to implement those activities, and the role of non-news-related media such as "entertainment programming" in avoiding or moderating conflict. |
|
References and resources |
Peter Gastrow, Search for Common Ground, Washington, DC. Robert Karl Manoff, Center for War, Peace, and the News Media, New York University, New York City. Nik Growing (writing a paper analyzing national and individual bias in the coverage of conflicts, forthcoming). Baumann, Melissa and Hannes Siebert. "The Media as Mediator," Forum (Winter 1993). Frank Chalk, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec. US Information Agency, Washington, DC. Internews, headquarters in Arcata, California, with regional offices in Paris, The Hague, Jerusalem, Sarajevo, Moscow, Kiev, Kazakhstan, Kyrghyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Georgia, and Armenia. |